1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 552 N.W.2d
  5. 552 N.W.2d 586 (1996)
 

RICHMOND v. NODLAND

Civ. No. 960104.

552 N.W.2d 586 (1996)

Donald RICHMOND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Irvin NODLAND and Amanda Broer, Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Rehearing Denied September 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Richmond, Bismarck, pro se.

Steven A. Storslee, Curtis L. Wike, Fleck, Mather & Strutz, Bismarck, for defendants and appellees. Argued by Curtis L. Wike.

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Donald Richmond appealed from the district court's summary judgment dismissing his complaint for slander per se, the tort of outrage, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against the defendants, Irvin Nodland and Amanda Broer. We conclude that Nodland's and Broer's statements to the police were protected by qualified privilege and that Richmond did not offer evidence of malice. We affirm the district court's dismissal.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases