1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 82 F.3d
  5. 82 F.3d 1052 (1996)
 

U.S. v. HANOVER INS. CO.

Nos. 95-1192, 95-1215.

82 F.3d 1052 (1996)

The UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HANOVER INSURANCE CO., Defendant/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rhonda K. Schnare, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General and David M. Cohen, Director.

Ronald W. Gerdes, Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Miami, Florida, argued for defendant/cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Gilbert Lee Sandler and Arthur K. Purcell.

Wayne Jarvis, Michael G. Hodes and James L. Sawyer, Hodes & Pilon, Chicago, Illinois, were on the brief for Amicus Curiae, Intercargo Insurance Company.

Before RICH, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that the United States Customs Service may not enforce a timebarred claim for antidumping duties by resort to administrative procedures. United States v. Hanover Ins. Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases