Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in limiting his testimony regarding a statement by an unknown third person that he had overheard a couple of weeks before the assault to the effect that the victim used cocaine. Defendant was permitted to testify concerning that person's statement to "watch out" for the victim because he carried a weapon. There is no basis to disturb the court's evidentiary
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.