1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 925 F.Supp.
  5. 925 F.Supp. 203 (1996)
 

REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORP. v. MARK I MARKETING CORP.

No. 94 Civ. 6756 (WCC).

925 F.Supp. 203 (1996)

The REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MARK I MARKETING CORPORATION, Mark I Marketing Corporation of America, and Wallace Edwards, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 16, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willkie Farr & Gallagher, New York City (David L. Foster, Stacey E. Paradise, of counsel), Fish & Neave, New York City (Thomas L. Secrest, of counsel), for Plaintiff.

Jaroslawicz & Jaros, New York City (David Jaroslawicz, Robert J. Tolchin, of counsel), for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation ("RHD") brings this action against defendants Mark I Marketing Corporation ("Mark I"), Mark I Marketing Corporation of America ("Mark I-A"), and Wallace Edwards ("Edwards") for a declaration that it is not infringing United States patent no. 4,554,241, that the patent is invalid, that it is not in violation of a licensing agreement (the "Agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases