STATE v. BAUMAN

No. C4-96-193.

552 N.W.2d 576 (1996)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Robert Fredrick BAUMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 20, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Christopher D. Cain, Mankato City Atty., Mankato, for Respondent.

Allen P. Eskens, Rockow Eskens Law Office, Mankato, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, P.J., KALITOWSKI and HOLTAN, JJ.


OPINION

HOLTAN, Judge.*

Appellant Robert Bauman challenges his conviction for driving after revocation of license, arguing that the statute requires operation of a motor vehicle on a street or highway. We affirm the conviction.

FACTS

On February 19, 1995, a sheriff's deputy stopped Bauman backing an automobile out of a space in a parking lot adjacent to the Blue Earth County Courthouse. The deputy cited Bauman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases