1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 77 Ohio
  5. 77 Ohio St.3d 35 (1996)
 

CHRISTY v. SUMMIT CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 96-2066.

77 Ohio St.3d 35 (1996)

CHRISTY ET AL. v. SUMMIT COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown, Lundgren & Goldthorpe, Charles E. Brown and Andrew L. Zumbar, for relators.

Maureen O'Connor, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and William E. Schultz, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Relators assert that they are entitled to the requested relief in prohibition because the initiative petition language for the proposed ordinance contained argument, misleading statements, and material omissions. In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, relators must establish that (1) the board is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) the exercise of such power is legally unauthorized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases