Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that reversal is mandated because Supreme Court failed to strike the testimony of a witness after he invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Because defendant neither objected to nor moved to strike that testimony, his contention has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Kaufman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.