GRIFFITH v. MOSS

No. 95-1309.

554 N.W.2d 571 (1996)

Douglas Lee GRIFFITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mardeen MOSS, Defendant-Appellee. Mardeen MOSS, Counterclaimant-Appellee, v. Douglas Lee GRIFFITH, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and City of Des Moines, Counterclaim Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.

August 30, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Carney of Carney, Williams, Blackburn, Grask & Appleby, Des Moines, and Stephen V. Nielsen, Des Moines, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Henry A. Harmon and Mark A. Schultheis of Grefe & Sidney, P.L.C., Des Moines, and Thomas Hyland of Hyland, Laden and Pearson, P.C., Des Moines, for Defendant-Appellee.

Considered by SACKETT, C.J., and CADY and VOGEL, JJ.


SACKETT, Chief Judge.

The focal issue in this appeal where both parties sought recovery following an automobile accident is whether plaintiff-appellant Douglas Griffith should have a new trial because he was not supplied a copy of a statement defendant-appellee Mardeen Moss gave to her liability insurance carrier in the month following the accident. We affirm.

The accident that gives rise to this litigation happened when Moss was attempting to make a left...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases