1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 556 N.W.2d
  5. 556 N.W.2d 567 (1996)
 

R.A., INC. v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.

No. C1-96-779.

556 N.W.2d 567 (1996)

R.A., INC., et al., Appellants, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 29, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Thomson, Steven D. Kelley, Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P., J. Michael Dady, Ronald K. Gardner, J. Michael Dady & Associates, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellants.

Jerry W. Snider, John Edward Connelly, Faegre & Benson LLP, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, P.J., and LANSING and KALITOWSKI, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

R.A., Inc., et al., (appellants) challenge the determinations of the district court that: (1) respondent Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (A-B) was entitled to summary judgment on appellants' claims of tortious interference with existing and prospective contracts; and (2) appellants lacked standing to bring a claim under the Minnesota Beer Brewers and Wholesalers Act (Act).

FACTS

A-B is a brewer of beers that sells its products...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases