1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 552 N.W.2d
  5. 552 N.W.2d 571 (1996)
 

UNTIEDT v. GRAND LABORATORIES, INC.

No. C3-96-590.

552 N.W.2d 571 (1996)

Charles UNTIEDT, et al., Appellants, v. GRAND LABORATORIES, INC., a South Dakota corporation, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 15, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard I. Diamond, Diamond, Liszt & Grady, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellants.

James E. Malters, Von Holtum, Malters & Shepherd, Worthington, for Respondents.

Considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and FOLEY, JJ.

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This appeal involves a determination by the trial court that Charles and Wanda Untiedt (collectively Untiedt) executed a valid and unambiguous contingent fee agreement with Douglas E. Schmidt and Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum, McCoy & Carey, Ltd. (firm). On appeal, Untiedt argues the trial court: (1) made a clearly erroneous finding that the parties executed a valid agreement; (2) erred in concluding the 40 percent contingent fee unambiguously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases