SAIKA v. GOLD

Docket No. G015591.

49 Cal.App.4th 1074 (1996)

CAROL LYNN SAIKA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT BARTON GOLD, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

September 30, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wagner & Scuderi and Jerome M. Wagner for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Robert Barton Gold, in pro per., Cifarelli & Cifarelli and Philip S. Cifarelli for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

(1) Arbitration has become highly favored as an economical, efficient alternative to traditional litigation in law courts. (See, e.g., Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1, 9 [10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183, 832 P.2d 899

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases