1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 466 S.E.2d
  5. 466 S.E.2d 655 (1996)
 

SALDONA v. STATE

No. A95A2711.

466 S.E.2d 655 (1996)

219 Ga. App. 762

SALDONA v. The STATE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

January 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Conrad M. Saldona, Peachtree City, Appellant pro se.

Saia, Richardson & Meinken, Joseph J. Saia, Peachtree City, for appellant.

Paul L. Howard, Jr., Solicitor General, Jane Morrison, Assistant Solicitor General, Atlanta, for appellee.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Saldona appeals his conviction of the offense of harassing phone calls (OCGA § 16-11-39(4)). Held:

1. The first enumeration of error maintains that the evidence is not sufficient to authorize defendant's conviction because there is evidence of only one telephone call in which defendant threatened the victim. Defendant's argument is predicated on an incorrect reading of Sarver v. State,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases