LIRIANO v. HOBART CORP.

No. 94 Civ. 5279 (SAS).

949 F.Supp. 171 (1996)

Luis LIRIANO, Plaintiff, v. HOBART CORPORATION, Defendant. HOBART CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. SUPER ASSOCIATED, Third-party Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 13, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abby J. Resnick, Trolman, Glaser & Lichtman, P.C., New York City, for Plaintiff.

Saul Wilensky, Robert D. Monnin, Carl J. Schaerf, Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, New York City, for Defendant.

William M. Kimball, New York City, for Third-Party Defendant.


Opinion and Order

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Defendants Hobart Corporation ("Hobart") and Super Associated ("Super") filed motions for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on October 21, 1996. On September 27, 1996, plaintiff moved for amendment of the retrial verdict. For the reasons set forth below, defendants' motion is denied and plaintiff's motion is granted.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases