1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 689 A.2d
  5. 689 A.2d 427 (1996)
 

SBC v. SO. BURLINGTON LIQ. CONTROL COM'N

Nos. 95-532, 95-565.

689 A.2d 427 (1996)

SBC ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON v. SBC ENTERPRISES, INC.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

December 13, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen Rush Shingler, Burlington, for plaintiff-appellant (95-532), defendant-appellant (95-565).

Steven F. Stitzel and Joseph S. McLean of Stitzel & Page, P.C., Burlington, for defendant-appellee (95-532), plaintiff-appellee (95-565).

Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.

GIBSON, Justice.

SBC Enterprises, Inc. appeals from a superior court order that declared valid an ordinance of the City of South Burlington requiring a license to provide live entertainment, and that enjoined SBC from providing live dance performances at Club Fantasy until it obtains a license. SBC also appeals from an order of the City's Liquor Control Commission that suspended SBC's liquor license for violating the City's entertainment and public-indecency ordinances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases