HASNUDEEN v. ONAN CORP.

No. CX-94-2106.

552 N.W.2d 555 (1996)

Robert HASNUDEEN and Tracy Hines, Appellants, v. ONAN CORPORATION, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 29, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., John M. Anderson, Charles E. Lundberg, Minneapolis, for Appellants.

Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, P.A., Richard A. Beens, Brad J. Miller, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

David Y. Trevor, Dorsey & Whitney P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for Amici Curiae, Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce, Employers Association, Inc.

Douglas A. Hedin, Andrea F. Rubenstein, Minneapolis, for Amicus Curiae, Minnesota Chapter National Employment Lawyers Association.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

We granted the petition of defendant Onan Corporation for further review of a decision of the court of appeals for the limited purpose of clarifying the relationship between this court's analysis in Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., 417 N.W.2d 619 (Minn.1988) and the pronouncement of the United States Supreme Court in St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases