1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 230 A.D.2d
  5. 230 A.D.2d 876 (1996)
 

MATTER OF WASSERMAN v. ADLER

230 A.D.2d 876 (1996)

646 N.Y.S.2d 636

In the Matter of Charles D. Wasserman et al., Appellants, v. Paul Adler et al., Respondents et al., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 20, 1996

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants challenge, among other things, the first petition designating Alexander J. Gromack on the ground that it failed to adequately describe the subject office. We find, however, that the description was "sufficiently informative * * * so as to preclude any reasonable probability of confusing or deceiving the signers, voters or board of elections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases