1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 230 A.D.2d
  5. 230 A.D.2d 874 (1996)
 

MATTER OF GROMACK v. HUESTED

230 A.D.2d 874 (1996)

646 N.Y.S.2d 637

In the Matter of Alexander J. Gromack, Respondent, v. Shirley Huested et al., Respondents, and Charles D. Wasserman, Intervenor-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 20, 1996

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that Alexander J. Gromack was an "aggrieved candidate" entitled to oppose the intervenor's opportunity to ballot petition (see, Matter of Liepshutz v Palmateer, 112 A.D.2d 1098, affd 65 N.Y.2d 963...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases