Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
There is no merit to the petitioner's contention that the Supreme Court erred in dismissing his petition. Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Division of Parole did not violate Executive Law § 259-i (3) (f) (i) in conducting the parole revocation hearing on February 2, 1995. The record evinces that two prior adjournments, which had been requested by the petitioner so as to permit...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.