BEDOW v. WATKINS

No. C7-95-484.

552 N.W.2d 543 (1996)

Virgil BEDOW, et al., Respondents, v. Randy J. WATKINS, Respondent, State of Minnesota Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund, Petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 15, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, Attorney General, Michael A. Sindt, St. Paul, for appellant.

James Anderson, Marshall, Randy Watkins, Sunberg, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This appeal involves the "diligent pursuit" requirements imposed upon claimants who seek to recover funds from the Minnesota Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund. Minn.Stat. § 82.34, subd. 7 (1994). The Fund was established in 1973 in part to pay unpaid judgments against real estate licensees, arising from actions covered by their real estate licenses. Minn.Stat. § 82.34 (1994); Moe v. Centurion Inv...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases