1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 938 F.Supp.
  5. 938 F.Supp. 155 (1996)
 

SAUER v. XEROX CORP.

No. 95-CV-6485L.

938 F.Supp. 155 (1996)

Fred SAUER, Plaintiff, v. XEROX CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

August 8, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve Mayka, Lacy, Katzen, Ryen & Mittleman, Rochester, NY, Gordon Locke, Gordon Locke Law Offices, New Rochelle, NY, for plaintiff.

John P. Coffey, Latham & Watkins, New York City, for defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The present controversy arises from a dispute regarding the rights and obligations of parties to two equipment lease agreements. Plaintiff Fred Sauer's original complaint was filed on September 5, 1995, in the Central District of California. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. On September 18, 1995, defendant Xerox Corporation ("Xerox") successfully transferred the action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases