1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 98 F.3d
  5. 98 F.3d 993 (1996)
 

UNIROYAL TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. N.L.R.B.

Nos. 96-1301, 95-3958.

98 F.3d 993 (1996)

UNIROYAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, ROYALITE DIVISION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and United Paperworkers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, Intervening-Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cary Schwimmer, Jay W. Kiesewetter (argued), Kiesewetter, Wise, Kaplan, Schwimmer & Prather, Memphis, TN, for Uniroyal Technology Corporation, Royalite Division.

Christopher W. Young (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong, Frederick C. Havard, National Labor Relations Board, Enforcement Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Alan L. Zmija, National Labor Relations Board, Indianapolis, IN, for National Labor Relations Board in No. 95-3958.

Christopher W. Young (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong, Frederick C. Havard, National Labor Relations Board, Enforcement Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Saudria Bordone, National Labor Relations Board, Indianapolis, IN, for National Labor Relations Board in No. 96-1301.

William R. Groth, Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth & Towe, Indianapolis, IN, for United Paperworkers International Union.

Before RIPPLE, DIANE P. WOOD and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

The production and maintenance employees at the Uniroyal Technology Corporation ("Uniroyal") plant in Warsaw, Indiana, in an election held on February 10, 1995, voted to have the United Paperworkers International Union ("Union") represent them as their exclusive bargaining representative. Uniroyal challenged the election. It alleged that the employees were denied a free choice because the Union had engaged in impermissible conduct by improperly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases