1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 925 S.W.2d
  5. 925 S.W.2d 166 (1996)
 

HANSON v. AMFUEL

No. CA 95-364.

925 S.W.2d 166 (1996)

54 Ark.App. 370

Mary HANSON, Appellant. v. AMFUEL and Travelers Insurance Company, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, En Banc.

July 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Compton, Prewett, Thomas & Hickey, P.A. by Floyd M. Thomas, El Dorado, for appellant.

Phillip Cuffman, Little Rock, for appellees.

GRIFFEN, Judge.

The issue posed by this appeal is whether the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission denying Mary Hanson's claim for additional medical benefits associated with her March 13, 1989, compensable injury is supported by substantial evidence. Hanson has appealed the Commission's decision and contends that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We have reviewed the record and concluded that substantial evidence exists to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases