1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 91 F.3d
  5. 91 F.3d 16 (1996)
 

IN RE MARINE SHALE PROCESSORS, INC.

No. 96-30697.

91 F.3d 16 (1996)

In re MARINE SHALE PROCESSORS, INC.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

K. Eric Gisleson, Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Toler & Sarpy, New Orleans, LA, Leslie Joseph Schiff, Opelousas, LA, Christopher Howard Marraro, Darren B. Bernhard, Howrey & Simon, Washington, DC, Jerrold Joseph Ganzfried, Howrey & Simon, Washington, DC, Sidney A. Cotlar, Russ M. Herman, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, New Orleans, LA, for petitioner.

Peter Aaron Appel, Env & Nat Resources (DOJ), Washington, DC, for U.S.

Adrian Duplantier, United States District Court, New Orleans, LA, pro se.

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, KING and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED.

I

This case comes to us under the following procedural posture. Our opinions have become final. United States v. Marine Shale Processors, Inc., 81 F.3d 1329 (5th Cir.1996); United States v. Marine Shale Processors, Inc., 81 F.3d 1361 (5th Cir.1996); Marine Shale Processors, Inc. v. United States Environmental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases