ECO SWISS CHINA TIME LTD. v. TIMEX CORP.

No. 3:96mc34 (JBA).

944 F.Supp. 134 (1996)

ECO SWISS CHINA TIME LTD. v. TIMEX CORPORATION.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 23, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter W. Peterson, Delio & Associates, New Haven, CT, for plaintiff.

Frank T. Judge, III, Timex Corp., Middlebury, CT, Thomas J. Hall, Chadbourne & Parke, New York City, for defendant.


RULING ON OBJECTIONS [doc. # 23]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Defendant objects to the Ruling on Motion for Discovery (Magistrate Judge Smith), filed June 13, 1996 [doc. # 14] on two grounds (other than disagreement with the conclusion). First, defendant maintains that the discovery ordered should be stayed until (and if) the Arbitration Panel determines the enforceability of the 1986 Agreement, since the discovery is unrelated to that threshold determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases