HAMILTON v. ACCU-TEK

No. 95 CV 0049 (JBW).

942 F.Supp. 136 (1996)

Freddie HAMILTON, Administratrix, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACCU-TEK, et al., Defendants. In re COURTROOM TELEVISION NETWORK, Applicant/Proposed Intervenor.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

October 18, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elisa Barnes, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

John F. Renzulli, Renzulli, Gainey & Rutherford, New York City, for Defendants.

Robert L. Joyce, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, New York City, for Defendants Accu-tek, A.M.T., Browning Arms Co., Caspian Arms Co., Davis Industries, Inc., European American Armory, Freedom Arms Co., Glock Inc., H & R 1871 Corp., International Armament, K.B.I. Corp., Mitchell Arms Inc., Navegar Inc., Para Ordnance Mfg. Inc., Savage Arms Corp., Thompson/Center Arms Co.

Daniel T. Hughes, Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, New York City, for Defendant American Arms Inc.

Timothy A. Bumann, Christopher J. York, Cozen and O'Connor, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants American Derringer, Bryco Arms, Calico Inc., Excam Inc., Firearms Import and Export Corp., Jennings Firearms Inc., Lorcin Engineering Co., Phoenix Arms Co., S.W. Daniels Inc., Taurus International Firearms Inc.

Michael J. Sommi, Cozen and O'Connor, New York City, for Defendants A.M.T., Bryco Arms, Calico Inc., Excam Inc., Lorcin Engineering Co., Taurus International Firearms Inc., Thompson Center Arms.

Patricia Fried Moores, Pino & Associates, White Plains, NY, for Defendants Beretta Firearms, Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

Peter James Johnson, Jr., Leahey & Johnson, P.C., New York City, for Defendant Century International Arms Inc.

Timothy Atwood, Ansonia, CT, for Defendant Charco.

Anne Giddings Kimball, Wildman, Harrold, Allen, Dixon & Smith, Chicago, IL, for Defendants Colt Industries Operating Corp., Colt's Mfg. Co., Inc., Marlin Firearms Inc., Remington Arms Co., Seecamp, Smith and Wesson Inc., Sturm, Ruger and Co., Inc.

Steven Jay Harfenist, Carroll & Harfenist, New York City, for Defendant S.W. Daniels, Inc..

Floyd Abrams, Jonathan Sherman, Cahill Gordon & Reindel, New York City, for the Intervenor.


AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge:

Courtroom Television Network ("Court TV") moved to intervene and for permission to broadcast the argument of pending motions. No objection was made by any party.

General Rule Seven of the Eastern District of New York permits an individual judge to decide if part or all of a case should be recorded for television broadcast, and what the conditions of that recording should be. Entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases