UNISYS MEDICAL PLAN v. TIMM

No. 96-1312.

98 F.3d 971 (1996)

UNISYS MEDICAL PLAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary TIMM and Kandis Timm, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 23, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Lipinski (argued), Keri B. Goldstein, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew A. Biegert (argued), Doar, Drill & Skow, New Richmond, WI, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before CUMMINGS, BAUER and EVANS, Circuit Judges.


TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

After Gary and Kandis Timm settled a state court personal injury case, the Unisys Medical Plan, a self-funded employee welfare benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., sued the Timms in federal court, seeking reimbursement of medical expenses it paid on Mr. Timm's behalf. After Unisys moved for summary judgment, the Timms moved to stay the federal case, arguing that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases