1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 925 P.2d
  5. 925 P.2d 144 (1996)
 

NORDSTROM, INC. v. WINDOM-HALL

WCB 90-06799; CA A89067.

925 P.2d 144 (1996)

144 Or. App. 96

In the Matter of the Compensation of Wonder Windom-Hall, Claimant. NORDSTROM, INC., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. Wonder WINDOM-HALL, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 16, 1996.

Review Denied January 14, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen O'Kasey, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With her on the briefs were Mildred J. Carmack and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt.

Karen Stolzberg, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With her on the brief was Goldberg, Mechanic & Stuart.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Claimant suffers from a number of conditions, including several vestibular disorders, encephalopathy and dysthymia, all of which she asserts are compensable because they resulted from her exposure to toxic or noxious fumes at her place of employment. Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board upholding the compensability of one of the vestibular disorders, perilymph fistulas. Claimant cross-petitions, contending that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases