1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 909 P.2d
  5. 909 P.2d 160 (1996)
 

KANE v. FORBES

SC S42626.

909 P.2d 160 (1996)

322 Or. 447

Henry KANE, Petitioner, v. Donald E. FORBES, Director, Oregon Department of Transportation, and Jim Hill, Treasurer, State of Oregon, Respondents, and Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided January 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Kane, petitioner pro se, argued the cause and filed the briefs.

Michael D. Reynolds, Assistant Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, filed a brief on behalf of intervenor.

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding is brought to challenge the constitutionality of the light rail funding provisions of Senate Bill 1156, enacted by the Oregon legislature in special session in August 1995. In McIntire v. Forbes, 322 Or. 426, 909 P.2d 846 (1996), this court has held that sections 1 to 17 of S.B. 1156 are invalid because of a violation of the "one-subject" requirement in Article IV...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases