Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of the motion of the City of Rochester (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. The safety regulation relied upon by plaintiff is sufficiently specific to support that cause of action (see, Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SHERIDAN v. CITY OF ROCHESTER
233 A.D.2d 836 (1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 896
Michael E. Sheridan, Appellant, v. City of Rochester, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 8, 1996
November 8, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.