1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 915 S.W.2d
  5. 915 S.W.2d 152 (1996)
 

SUTTON v. MANKOFF

No. 2-95-064-CV.

915 S.W.2d 152 (1996)

Ruth SUTTON and William Sutton, Appellants, v. Ronald M. MANKOFF; Durant, Mankoff, Davis, Wolens & Francis, P.C.; Mankoff & Hill, P.C.; and Mankoff, Hill, Held & Goldburg, P.C., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Rehearing Overruled February 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Art Brender, Fort Worth, for appellant.

C.J. Muller, Farley P. Katz, Anthony E. Rebollo, Matthews & Branscomb, San Antonio, for appellee.

Before CAYCE, C.J., and RICHARDS and HOLMAN, JJ.

OPINION

HOLMAN, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. Ruth and William Sutton filed suit alleging damages from deceptive trade practices and the intentional infliction of emotional distress. The defendants included Ronald M. Mankoff, three lawfirms in which he is a principal, and eight others. The trial court severed the plaintiffs' cause against Mankoff and his three lawfirms, granting those defendants a summary judgment on the ground that all causes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases