WASHINGTON v. MILBANK INS. CO.

No. C2-95-2627.

551 N.W.2d 513 (1996)

Ruth WASHINGTON, et al, Respondents, v. MILBANK INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 23, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Sieben, Bradley H. Ratgen, David G. Moeller & Associates, Minneapolis, for Respondents.

Kenneth P. Gleason, Mahoney, Dougherty and Mahoney, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and CRIPPEN and SCHUMACHER, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Respondents Ruth and Booker Washington brought a suit against a tortfeasor and then concluded a settlement of the claim. Appellant Milbank Insurance Company contends that it has the option to refuse consent for the settlement. In this suit, where respondents seek a judgment for arbitration of their underinsurance claims, appellant asserts that the trial court erred, absent appellant's consent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases