1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 96 F.3d
  5. 96 F.3d 964 (1996)
 

U.S. v. BATES

No. 95-2203.

96 F.3d 964 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Garrit BATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth Hennage (argued), Office of the U.S. Attorney, South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

C. Richard Oren (argued), Rochester, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before CUDAHY, FLAUM, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

After Garrit Bates was charged with twelve counts of willfully misapplying federally guaranteed Title IV student aid funds, he filed a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment as insufficient. Specifically, he argued that both conversion and intent to injure or defraud the federal government are elements of the offense of willfully misapplying financial aid monies and that the indictment had failed to adequately allege either one. The district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases