Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit telephone call forwarding and violating telephone privileges. Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt on the ground that it was not based on substantial evidence. We disagree. Adduced in evidence against petitioner was the misbehavior report which related that petitioner had placed a telephone call to Texas on behalf of a fellow inmate by identifying himself as a Federal Drug...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
