1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 926 F.Supp.
  5. 926 F.Supp. 117 (1996)
 

TROUT v. FREGA

No. 94 C 4335.

926 F.Supp. 117 (1996)

Jay M. TROUT, Plaintiff, v. Joseph FREGA, Joseph Heinrich, Robert Steinman, and Jeffrey Wolf, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

May 2, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. Solmor, Friedman and Olson, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Blake Wolfe Horwitz, Law Offices of Blake Horwitz, Chicago, IL, Anthony R. Elman, Law Office of Fred W. Elmond, Mundelein, IL, for Jay M. Trout.

Elizabeth Ann Knight, George P. Smyrniotis, Knight, Hoppe, Fanning & Knight, Ltd., Des Plaines, IL, for Joseph Frega, Joseph Heinrich, Robert Steinman and Jeffrey Wolf.

Richard Charles Huettel, Cassiday, Schade & Gloor, Chicago, IL, Richard A. Barrett, Jr., Cassiday, Schade & Gloor, Wheaton, IL, for City of Geneva.

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

I. Background1

Plaintiff Jay M. Trout ("Trout") filed a one-count Amended Complaint against Defendants Joseph Frega ("Frega"), Joseph Heinrich ("Heinrich"), Robert Steinman ("Steinman"), and Jeffrey Wolf ("Wolf") (collectively, "Defendants"). Trout...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases