In our view, Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). Even giving plaintiff's pro se pleadings the benefit of every favorable inference, as is appropriate on such a motion, we fail to discern any cognizable cause of action upon which relief could be granted (see, Di Nezza v Credit Data of Hudson Val.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MALPHRUS v. CARRK
227 A.D.2d 809 (1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 822
James E. Malphrus, Appellant, v. Vic Carrk, as Supervisor of The Town of Coeymans, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 16, 1996
May 16, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
