1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 934 F.Supp.
  5. 934 F.Supp. 101 (1996)
 

ARTIS v. LIOTARD

No. 94 CV 3342.

934 F.Supp. 101 (1996)

James ARTIS, Plaintiff, v. Edward LIOTARD, John Calvello, South Fallsberg, Police Department, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 26, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Artis, Ossining, NY, pro se.

Monte J. Rosenstein, Rosenstein & Helhoski, P.C., Middletown, NY, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER

PARKER, District Judge.

FACTS

This pro se action for the violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is before the Court on defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff, Robert James Artis, claims that defendant police officers, Edward Liotard and John Calvello, arrested him on December 23, 1992 without probable cause. He accordingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases