1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 670 N.E.2d
  5. 670 N.E.2d 363 (1996)
 

GOUGE v. NORTHERN IND. COMMUTER TRANSP.

No. 46A03-9506-CV-183.

670 N.E.2d 363 (1996)

Chester K. GOUGE, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. NORTHERN INDIANA COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, Appellee-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

August 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Kapitan, Sachs & Hess, P.C., Hammond, Frank W. Petro, and F. Daniel Petro, Petro & Petro, Chicago, IL, for Appellant-Plaintiff.

Michael C. Harris and L. Charles Lukmann, III, Harris Welsh & Lukmann, Chesterton, for Appellee-Defendant.

OPINION

GARRARD, Judge

Chester Gouge contends that the jury verdict entered in his favor with regard to his complaint under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA)1 was inadequate because the jury was not instructed that assumption of risk was no defense, and the court excluded evidence of subsequent remedial measures. Gouge further contends that he is entitled to certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases