1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 955 F.Supp.
  5. 955 F.Supp. 73 (1996)
 

PINSKI v. ADELMAN

No. 94 C 5783.

955 F.Supp. 73 (1996)

James B. PINSKI, Dolores Pinski, Michael Pinski, David Pinski, Kevin Pinski, and Ronald L. Pinski as Trustee of the James B. Pinski Irrevocable Insurance Trust, Plaintiffs, v. Gerald S. ADELMAN, Gerald S. Adelman & Associates, Ltd., Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company, Jackson National Life Insurance Company, Security Connecticut Life Insurance Company, Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company, and Connecticut National Life Insurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

September 12, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Whitman Henry Brisky, Leon E. Lindenbaum, Lindenbaum, Coffman, Kurlander, Brisky & Hayes, Ltd., Chicago, IL, William E. Russell, Chicago, IL, for James B. Pinski, Dolores Pinski, Michael Pinski, David Pinski, Kevin Pinski, Ronald L. Pinski.

Michael Nicholas Ripani, Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Michael Cleary Bruck, David M. Jenkins, Quinlan & Crisham, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Gerald S. Adelman, Gerald S. Adelman & Associates, Ltd.

Paul R. Garry, Patrick James Foley, Michael Irving Leonard, Bates, Meckler, Bulger & Tilson, Chicago, IL, for Federal Kemper Life Assurance Companies.

David A. Axelrod, Mark K. Schoenfield, John Eliot Garber, Schoenberg, Fisher & Newman, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Jackson Nat. Life Ins. Co.

Aaron Edward Hoffman, Cherie Ann Duve, Schwartz & Freeman, Chicago, IL, for Security Connecticut Life Ins. Co.

J. Robert Geiman, William A. Chittenden, III, Douglas John Varga, Elizabeth Gwynn Dobie, Peterson & Ross, Chicago, IL, for Phoenix Home Life Mut. Ins. Co.

Donald E. Frechette, Edwards & Angell, Hartford, CT, for Connecticut Nat. Life Ins. Co.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek to file a "Second Amendment to the Amended Complaint," asserting vicarious liability by various insurance companies under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act on the basis of the apparent or actual authority of defendant Adelman as their agent. The proposed amendments do explicitly so allege, and if this were the initial pleading we would hesitate to dismiss it. This pleading is, however...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases