1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 923 F.Supp.
  5. 923 F.Supp. 103 (1996)
 

ARMOR v. MICHELIN TIRE CORP.

Civil Action No. 6:95-779.

923 F.Supp. 103 (1996)

Carolyn ARMOR and Richard T. Armor, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. MICHELIN TIRE CORP. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division.

April 23, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Lantz, Lantz & Tebay, Parkersburg, WV, G. Rand Smith, Columbus, OH, Dennis L. Sipe, Buell & Sipe Co., Marietta, OH, for plaintiffs.

James L. McCrystal, Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, Cleveland, OH, John F. Polak and Michelle M. Price, King, Allen & Guthrie, Charleston, WV, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is Defendants' motion for Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs have responded and Defendants have replied. The Court GRANTS the motion.

The standard used to determine whether a motion for summary judgment should be granted or denied has been stated by our Court of Appeals as follows:

A moving party is entitled to summary judgment `if the pleading, depositions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases