GORDON v. CITY OF PORTLAND

94-06925; CA A90778.

927 P.2d 96 (1996)

144 Or. App. 471

In the Matter of the Compensation of Jean M. Gordon, Claimant. Jean M. GORDON, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 13, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda C. Love, Lake Oswego, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was Anthony A. Allen, Salem.

David L. Jorling, Senior Deputy City Attorney, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Scott Kozuma, Associate Deputy City Attorney.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


HASELTON, Judge.

Claimant sought review from the Workers' Compensation Board's order on reconsideration that adhered to an earlier order on review, finding claimant to have 100% impairment of one eye, pursuant to ORS 656.214(2).1 We affirm.

This case involves the proper rating, for scheduled disability purposes, of binocular diplopia. A person with binocular diplopia "sees double" when both eyes are open.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases