PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges his conviction for second degree murder contending that the trial court reversibly erred in failing to suppress the oral statements that he made to the police. We affirm.
It is well settled that a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress arrives at the appellate court clothed in a presumption of correctness and absent clear error of law or fact, the appellate court must interpret the evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
