1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 935 S.W.2d
  5. 935 S.W.2d 83 (1996)
 

HASTEN v. WAL-MART

Nos. 69770, 69971.

935 S.W.2d 83 (1996)

Joy HASTEN, Employee/Appellant, v. WAL-MART, Employer/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

December 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex M. Burlison, O'Fallon, for employee/appellant.

Laura E. Smith, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Eva C. Sterner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Second Injury Fund.

Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Claimant alleges the administrative law judge used the wrong legal standard when determining causation and that the decision of the Commission is not supported by substantial and competent evidence. We have carefully reviewed all of the evidence in the record and find competent and substantial evidence exists to support the Commission's decision and such evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases