PRESIDENTIAL ESTATES APT. v. BARRETT

No. 63079-8.

917 P.2d 100 (1996)

129 Wash.2d 320

PRESIDENTIAL ESTATES APARTMENT ASSOCIATES, a Washington Joint Venture, and Stanley V. Piha, Managing Joint Venturer, Respondents, v. William E. BARRETT and Sally T. Barrett, husband and wife, Robert V. Yeakel and Fern L. Yeakel, husband and wife, and Barrett-Yeakel, a Washington general partnership, Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided May 30, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon, Thomas & Honeywell, John C. Guadnola, Tacoma, for petitioners.

Sternberg, Thomson & Okrent, Terry E. Thomson, Seattle, for respondents.


ALEXANDER, Justice.

Relying on Civil Rule 60(a), which authorizes a trial court to correct a "clerical error,"1 the trial court entered an amended judgment, stating that the original judgment was in error to the extent it did not reflect its intention regarding two issues. The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that the amended judgment did not remedy a clerical error, but instead dealt with what the Court of Appeals considered to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases