CRANDAL v. BALL, BALL AND BROSAMER, INC.

No. 94-16829.

99 F.3d 907 (1996)

Gregory Lee CRANDAL; dba Engineered Coatings, Inc.; Lyle John Hitchcock, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BALL, BALL and BROSAMER, INC.; Don Meek; Milton Greenstein; Hal Stolber, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 31, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick A. Plummer, Law Office of Patrick A. Plummer, Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Richard A. Friedlander, (on the briefs), D. Samuel Coffman (argued), Mariscal, Weeks, McIntyre & Friedlander, Phoenix, AZ, for defendants-appellees.

Before: ALARCON, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this case is whether a subcontractor has a private cause of action for money due from a contractor under the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 637(d).

FACTS

The United States Bureau of Reclamation hired the lead defendant to repair an aqueduct. Much of the work was application of a sealant to cracks, so that the water would not leak out. The contractor subcontracted this part of the job to KGE, a woman-owned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases