Respondent challenges Family Court's determination that he permanently neglected his child on the ground that petitioner did not, as required by Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (a), prove that he failed to plan for the future of the child for a period of more than one year. For the reasons that follow, we reject his contention and, accordingly, affirm Family Court's order.
Facially, the record demonstrates compliance with the temporal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
