1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 960 F.Supp.
  5. 960 F.Supp. 42 (1996)
 

COPELCO CAPITAL, INC. v. GENERAL CONSUL OF BOLIVIA

96 Civil 4565(LAK).

960 F.Supp. 42 (1996)

COPELCO CAPITAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL CONSUL OF BOLIVIA, etc., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 25, 1996.

ORDER

KAPLAN, District Judge.

Although the Court disagrees with plaintiff's construction of the relevant portion of the contract, there was a sufficient basis for counsel's actions so that sanctions will not be imposed. Counsel would have been better advised to have quoted the language of the contract in full and to have made his argument. By failing to do so, he inadvertently created an unfortunate impression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases