Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the court improvidently exercised its discretion and committed reversible error by curtailing the cross-examination of the arresting officer with regard to paperwork filed in connection with the defendant's accomplice is without merit. The scope and extent of cross-examination is within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, People v Sorge,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.