1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 900 S.W.2d
  5. 900 S.W.2d 90 (1995)
 

NORTH DALLAS DIAGNOSTIC v. DEWBERRY

No. 05-92-00489-CV.

900 S.W.2d 90 (1995)

NORTH DALLAS DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, Appellant, v. Jacqueline Riley DEWBERRY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael W. Huddleston, R. Brent Cooper, Cooper Huddleston & Aldous, P.C., Dallas, Teresa Bohne, Irving, and Brenda Neel Hight, Cantey & Hanger, L.L.P., Dallas, for appellant.

John K. Horany and David Rodriguez Weiner, Law offices of Windle Turley, P.C., Dallas, for appellee.

Before THOMAS, C.J., and OVARD and MORRIS, JJ.

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

In this medical malpractice action, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in allowing an expert to testify on causation without a showing that the expert's opinion was based on valid and well-grounded scientific knowledge. A jury found appellant North Dallas Diagnostic Center (the Center) liable for injuries sustained by appellee Jacqueline Riley Dewberry after she was injected with a contrast dye. On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases