Ordered that the judgment and order are affirmed.
The defendant contends that error took place during the prosecutor's cross examination of him and during the testimony of one of the complainants regarding her religious faith. We find that these contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v Crimmins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.