1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 67 F.3d
  5. 67 F.3d 917 (1995)
 

McCOY v. MITSUBOSHI CUTLERY, INC.

No. 95-1087.

67 F.3d 917 (1995)

Duncan McCOY, Alex Dorsett, and Alex-Duncan Shrimp Chef, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MITSUBOSHI CUTLERY, INC., and Admiral Craft Equipment Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 30, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Bishop, George M. Bishop and Associates, Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Of counsel were Guy C. Matthews and J. Albert Riddle, Matthews and Associates, Houston, Texas.

William W. Goodrich, Jr., Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin and Kahn, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Jennifer A. Albert and Marilyn T. Dare.

Before MAYER, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Duncan McCoy, Alex Dorsett, and Alex-Duncan Shrimp Chef, Inc. (McCoy) sued Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc. (Mitsuboshi) and Admiral Craft Equipment Corp. (Admiral Craft) for infringing McCoy's intellectual property rights and committing business torts. McCoy's sales organization had hired Mitsuboshi to make and supply shrimp knives covered by McCoy's patent and trademarks. When Mitsuboshi produced the knives, McCoy refused to pay for them. Mitsuboshi...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases